From NWChem
You are viewing a single post from the thread title above
|
Clicked A Few Times
Threads 13
Posts 34
|
|
2:42:37 PM PDT - Tue, Apr 24th 2012 |
|
Update, calculate with .fdrst present
|
UPDATE: OK, I tried, and did in fact get more gradient information, but the intervals make it seem like everything was being recalculated. For example, from the initial calculation (which got through atom 32 1(+) )
atom: 1 xyz: 1(+) wall time: 16005.8 date: Fri Apr 20 19:49:54 2012
atom: 1 xyz: 1(-) wall time: 16177.1 date: Fri Apr 20 19:52:46 2012
atom: 1 xyz: 2(+) wall time: 16339.6 date: Fri Apr 20 19:55:28 2012
atom: 1 xyz: 2(-) wall time: 16560.5 date: Fri Apr 20 19:59:09 2012
atom: 1 xyz: 3(+) wall time: 16726.7 date: Fri Apr 20 20:01:55 2012
atom: 1 xyz: 3(-) wall time: 16893.0 date: Fri Apr 20 20:04:42 2012
and from the “restart” (which got through atom 41 2(-) ):
atom: 1 xyz: 1(+) wall time: 268.4 date: Mon Apr 23 20:23:13 2012
atom: 1 xyz: 1(-) wall time: 560.5 date: Mon Apr 23 20:28:05 2012
atom: 1 xyz: 2(+) wall time: 777.3 date: Mon Apr 23 20:31:42 2012
atom: 1 xyz: 2(-) wall time: 1181.9 date: Mon Apr 23 20:38:26 2012
atom: 1 xyz: 3(+) wall time: 1477.0 date: Mon Apr 23 20:43:22 2012
atom: 1 xyz: 3(-) wall time: 1890.4 date: Mon Apr 23 20:50:15 2012
Is there an RTDB setting to avoid recalculation? Any other changes that should be made to the input deck?
|
Edited On 2:50:10 PM PDT - Tue, Apr 24th 2012 by Cchang
|
|
|
AWC's:
2.5.10 MediaWiki - Stand Alone Forum Extension
Forum theme style by: AWC