SEARCH
TOOLBOX
LANGUAGES
Forum Menu

Armci error 260 cond:0

From NWChem

You are viewing a single post from the thread title above
Jump to: navigation, search

Click here for full thread
  • Guest -
    Send PM
Quote:Diegoagomezh Nov 5th 10:48 am
Hello..

Bert Thank you for your answer!!

I have partially solved my problem...

I was forgetting the "spherical nosegment" keywords (required for the correlation-consistent basis set) in the BASIS directive line.

Actually, I don't know why the calculations with the cc-pVDZ (for C,O and H) and 6-31G (for Ni atoms) finished successfully without the "spherical nosegment" statement. (perhaps because the 6-31g presence?).

Well...
After this correction and fixing the memory line according to Bert's comment, the
"ARMCI DASSERT fail. signaltrap.c:SigBusHandler():213 cond:0" Error apparently was solved.

However, now the calculation stop after the first SCF energy calculation when the RI-MP2 module starts. I get the error:

1:Segmentation Violation error, status=: 11
(rank:1 hostname:cl1n006 pid:3330):ARMCI DASSERT fail. signaltrap.c:SigSegvHandler():301 cond:0

Anna
In a trial I got the "Armci error 260 cond:0" and the problem was a wrong keyword in the BASIS directive, I wrote "nosegmented" (wrong) instead of "nosement" (right). Perhaps you problem is related with this.

Thanks again for any reply!..


Spherical nosegment should not be the issue. I would strongly recommend removing the nosegment keyword. There is no reason for using it (not required for the basis set) and it increases memory usage. I would have to see an input deck so that I could test it and provide you more input.

Bert


Who's here now Members 0 Guests 0 Bots/Crawler 0


AWC's: 2.5.10 MediaWiki - Stand Alone Forum Extension
Forum theme style by: AWC