Dielectric Properties at MP2 and CCSD(T) level of theory

From NWChem

Viewed 2166 times, With a total of 6 Posts
Jump to: navigation, search

  • Guest -
    Send PM
Hi NWChem Users and Developers!

I am trying to perform some test calculations using LiF as a test case. I try to calculate
the static polarizability and electric dipole moment at the MP2/cc-pVTZ and CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ level
of theory, respectively, by requesting

property
 response 1 0.0
dipole
end

For DFT and HF calculations the code (v6.0 by the way) produces the desired output
but for MP2 and CCSD(T) following error occurs
number of frequencies:     1
frequency in a.u.: 0.0000000E+00
Perturbing field: electric
Using Dipole Length Gauge

 movecs_read_header: failed to open ./ IERR =                    21
------------------------------------------------------------------------
hnd_vec_read: failed to read header 911

Does someone have an idea what the problem might be?

Thanks in advance

Sven

  • Bert Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, NWChemDeveloper, bureaucrat, sysop
    Profile
    Send PM
Forum Vet
Threads 5
Posts 598
Hi Sven,

As started in the properties section of the manual, the properties defined there are only available for SCF and DFT. We do however have MP2 and CCSD(T) response properties. Those can be accessed from TCE, see http://www.nwchem-sw.org/index.php/TCE#TCE_Response_Properties for details.

Thanks,

Bert



Quote: Aug 23rd 11:41 am
Hi NWChem Users and Developers!

I am trying to perform some test calculations using LiF as a test case. I try to calculate
the static polarizability and electric dipole moment at the MP2/cc-pVTZ and CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ level
of theory, respectively, by requesting

property
 response 1 0.0
dipole
end

For DFT and HF calculations the code (v6.0 by the way) produces the desired output
but for MP2 and CCSD(T) following error occurs
number of frequencies:     1
frequency in a.u.: 0.0000000E+00
Perturbing field: electric
Using Dipole Length Gauge

 movecs_read_header: failed to open ./ IERR =                    21
------------------------------------------------------------------------
hnd_vec_read: failed to read header 911

Does someone have an idea what the problem might be?

Thanks in advance

Sven

  • Guest -
    Send PM
Hi Bert!

Thanks for you fast response.

I have performed some test calculations for LiF again. The geometry is optimized using the MP2 routine. For the MP2 calculations the polarizabilities are not available using the MP2 routine but the dipole moments are. The result is a dipole moment of -2.424 a.u. (called SCF+MP2 in the output file). For the same geometry the TCE single point calculation results in a value of 2.780 a.u. . The former value
is much closer to the experimental result (2.472 a.u.) obtained by Stark-modulated MW spectroscopy (J. Chem. Phys. 38 1203 1963). Therefore I wondered what the difference between the two routines might be?

Best wishes

Sven

  • Bert Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, NWChemDeveloper, bureaucrat, sysop
    Profile
    Send PM
Forum Vet
Threads 5
Posts 598
Can you send me the input deck.

Bert


Quote: Aug 29th 2:51 pm
Hi Bert!

Thanks for you fast response.

I have performed some test calculations for LiF again. The geometry is optimized using the MP2 routine. For the MP2 calculations the polarizabilities are not available using the MP2 routine but the dipole moments are. The result is a dipole moment of -2.424 a.u. (called SCF+MP2 in the output file). For the same geometry the TCE single point calculation results in a value of 2.780 a.u. . The former value
is much closer to the experimental result (2.472 a.u.) obtained by Stark-modulated MW spectroscopy (J. Chem. Phys. 38 1203 1963). Therefore I wondered what the difference between the two routines might be?

Best wishes

Sven

  • Guest -
    Send PM
Hi Bert!

It seems that the problem is that for mbpt2 the code is not able to do response properties or calculations for the dipole moment. I think you mentioned in your first answer in the forum that response properties are available for MBPT and CC calculations. So I am not sure if I have a mistake in my input, if the calculation is available in general. The input file for the job is:

start LiF

memory total 2500 mb

geometry
 symmetry c1
Li 0 0 0.00
F 0 0 1.56
end

basis spherical
 Li library cc-pvtz
F library cc-pvtz
end

tce
freeze core
MBPT2
io ga
2eorb
dipole
tilesize 16
end

set tce:lineresp T
set tce:afreq 0.000
set tce:respaxis T T T

mp2
 freeze core
end

task mp2 optimize
task mp2 freq numerical

task tce energy

tce
freeze core
ccsd(t)
io ga
2eorb
dipole
tilesize 16
end

task tce energy

The MP2 part is running fine and is giving the SCF and SCF+MP2 dipole moments. If you perform mbpt2 calculations in tce it does not seem to perform any calculations of the dipole moment or polarizability. Only the SCF part is given in the output (agrees with the results of the MP2 routine). On the other hand similar settings produce the desired output for CCSD(T) calculations (by the way I do not understand why the CCSD(T) results for the dipole moment or worse than the MP2 results.).

If you wish I could send you see output file.

Best wishes and thanks in advance

Sven

P.S.: Tried to email you this file but I am not sure if it worked, since a error occurred every time I tried to email. Consequently I am posting it here as well.

  • Bert Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, NWChemDeveloper, bureaucrat, sysop
    Profile
    Send PM
Forum Vet
Threads 5
Posts 598
Sven,

This was my mistake. Response properties in TCE are only available for CCSD, CCSD(T), and CCSDT.

As to why the CCSD(T) is further away from experiment then MP2, this might be geometry dependent. Have you tried optimizing at the CCSD(T) level and to get the dipole moment there.

Bert


Quote: Sep 3rd 6:50 pm
Hi Bert!

It seems that the problem is that for mbpt2 the code is not able to do response properties or calculations for the dipole moment. I think you mentioned in your first answer in the forum that response properties are available for MBPT and CC calculations. So I am not sure if I have a mistake in my input, if the calculation is available in general. The input file for the job is:

start LiF

memory total 2500 mb

geometry
 symmetry c1
Li 0 0 0.00
F 0 0 1.56
end

basis spherical
 Li library cc-pvtz
F library cc-pvtz
end

tce
freeze core
MBPT2
io ga
2eorb
dipole
tilesize 16
end

set tce:lineresp T
set tce:afreq 0.000
set tce:respaxis T T T

mp2
 freeze core
end

task mp2 optimize
task mp2 freq numerical

task tce energy

tce
freeze core
ccsd(t)
io ga
2eorb
dipole
tilesize 16
end

task tce energy

The MP2 part is running fine and is giving the SCF and SCF+MP2 dipole moments. If you perform mbpt2 calculations in tce it does not seem to perform any calculations of the dipole moment or polarizability. Only the SCF part is given in the output (agrees with the results of the MP2 routine). On the other hand similar settings produce the desired output for CCSD(T) calculations (by the way I do not understand why the CCSD(T) results for the dipole moment or worse than the MP2 results.).

If you wish I could send you see output file.

Best wishes and thanks in advance

Sven

P.S.: Tried to email you this file but I am not sure if it worked, since a error occurred every time I tried to email. Consequently I am posting it here as well.

Clicked A Few Times
Threads 0
Posts 30
Quote:Bert Sep 6th 4:43 pm
Sven,

This was my mistake. Response properties in TCE are only available for CCSD, CCSD(T), and CCSDT.

As to why the CCSD(T) is further away from experiment then MP2, this might be geometry dependent. Have you tried optimizing at the CCSD(T) level and to get the dipole moment there.

Bert



TCE response properties are available in the public version of NWChem for CCSD and CCSDT only.

Strictly speaking, CCSD(T) doesn't have a response function. The code corresponding to our paper [1] isn't released, not the least because that method requires great care to be used properly.

MP2 properties beyond first-order are available in Dalton and CFOUR, among others. Personally, I think the accuracy of CCSD is worth the computational effort for response properties.

Best,

Jeff


Forum >> NWChem's corner >> Running NWChem



Who's here now Members 0 Guests 1 Bots/Crawler 0


AWC's: 2.5.10 MediaWiki - Stand Alone Forum Extension
Forum theme style by: AWC