SEARCH
TOOLBOX
LANGUAGES
Forum Menu

COSMO convergence

From NWChem

Viewed 261 times, With a total of 7 Posts
Jump to: navigation, search

Clicked A Few Times
Threads 3
Posts 11
Hi,

I do not converge COSMO calculation. Could you be so kind to help me?


start nw
memory stack 600 mb heap 100 mb global 800 mb
charge 0
geometry 
 C    -0.60565725 1.25747713 0 
 C    -1.39183577 0.104224 0   
 C    -0.78617852 -1.15325313 0
 C    0.60565725 -1.25747713 0 
 C    1.39183577 -0.104224 0   
 C    0.78617852 1.15325313 0  
 H    -1.0766783 2.23541955 0  
 H    -2.47426927 0.18527902 0 
 H    -1.39759097 -2.05014053 0
 H    1.0766783 -2.23541955 0  
 H    2.47426927 -0.18527902 0 
 H    1.39759097 2.05014053 0  
end 
basis cartesian
 * library aug-cc-pvdz
end 
dft 
 CONVERGENCE density 1e-6
 xc pbe0
end 
cosmo 
 dielec 78.4
end 
esp 
 recalculate 
 probe   0.07
 range   0.3
 factor  1
 spacing 0.02
end 
property 
 dipole 
 quadrupole 
end 
task DFT property
task esp

  • Bert Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, NWChemDeveloper, bureaucrat, sysop
    Profile
    Send PM
Forum Vet
Threads 3
Posts 331
Per documentation: http://www.nwchem-sw.org/index.php/Release61:Density_Functional_Theory_for_Molecules#ITERA...


Quote:P99 Feb 10th 4:27 pm
Hi,

I do not converge COSMO calculation. Could you be so kind to help me?


start nw
memory stack 600 mb heap 100 mb global 800 mb
charge 0
geometry 
 C    -0.60565725 1.25747713 0 
 C    -1.39183577 0.104224 0   
 C    -0.78617852 -1.15325313 0
 C    0.60565725 -1.25747713 0 
 C    1.39183577 -0.104224 0   
 C    0.78617852 1.15325313 0  
 H    -1.0766783 2.23541955 0  
 H    -2.47426927 0.18527902 0 
 H    -1.39759097 -2.05014053 0
 H    1.0766783 -2.23541955 0  
 H    2.47426927 -0.18527902 0 
 H    1.39759097 2.05014053 0  
end 
basis cartesian
 * library aug-cc-pvdz
end 
dft 
 CONVERGENCE density 1e-6
 xc pbe0
end 
cosmo 
 dielec 78.4
end 
esp 
 recalculate 
 probe   0.07
 range   0.3
 factor  1
 spacing 0.02
end 
property 
 dipole 
 quadrupole 
end 
task DFT property
task esp

Gets Around
Threads 1
Posts 64
switch to spherical basis set because of linear dependence
P99,
I strongly recommend you to switch from cartesian to spherical basis in your input,
since you have a few linear dependencies causing numerical problem.
Once you switch to spherical, the dependencies are gone, and the convergence is much smoother.
In other words, the basis set input lines should be

basis spherical
* library aug-cc-pvdz
end


Cheers, Edo

Clicked A Few Times
Threads 3
Posts 11
Unfortunately, neither an increase the number of iterations (up 500) nor a spherical basis are not help.

  • Bert Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, NWChemDeveloper, bureaucrat, sysop
    Profile
    Send PM
Forum Vet
Threads 3
Posts 331
The following input deck will converge without any problems, using an SCF as a starting guess for the DFT, and setting "tolerances tight" to avoid more loose integral and matrix element calculations during the early iterations of DFT.

Bert




start nw
memory stack 600 mb heap 100 mb global 800 mb
charge 0

geometry
C    -0.60565725 1.25747713 0 
C -1.39183577 0.104224 0
C -0.78617852 -1.15325313 0
C 0.60565725 -1.25747713 0
C 1.39183577 -0.104224 0
C 0.78617852 1.15325313 0
H -1.0766783 2.23541955 0
H -2.47426927 0.18527902 0
H -1.39759097 -2.05014053 0
H 1.0766783 -2.23541955 0
H 2.47426927 -0.18527902 0
H 1.39759097 2.05014053 0
end

basis spherical
* library aug-cc-pvdz
end

scf
vectors output nw.movecs
end

task scf

dft
tolerances tight
CONVERGENCE density 1e-6
xc pbe0
vectors input nw.movecs
end

cosmo
dielec 78.4
end

esp
recalculate 
probe 0.07
range 0.3
factor 1
spacing 0.02
end

property
dipole 
quadrupole
end

task DFT property
task esp


Quote:P99 Feb 13th 6:22 am
Unfortunately, neither an increase the number of iterations (up 500) nor a spherical basis are not help.

Clicked A Few Times
Threads 3
Posts 11
Quote:Bert Feb 13th 6:32 pm
The following input deck will converge without any problems, using an SCF as a starting guess for the DFT, and setting "tolerances tight" to avoid more loose integral and matrix element calculations during the early iterations of DFT.


Really this code converges in DFT, and ... then crashes. It would be nice to have the solution of the task, but not the convergence of the DFT per se. The convergence of the DFT requires a spherical basis, the calculation of charges requires a cartesian. As a result, we have not solution.

  • Bert Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, NWChemDeveloper, bureaucrat, sysop
    Profile
    Send PM
Forum Vet
Threads 3
Posts 331
There seems to be something going on in the DFT when it users high symmetry. Will are going to use your test case to resolve the issue. A couple of solutions in the mean time:

1. Turn off symmetry by specifying noautosym in the geometry block, i.e. "geometry noautosym". This will get your calculation to converge at the DFT level with NWChem 6.0.

2. Install the brand new NWChem 6.1. With this code you can get ESP charges with spherical basis sets.

3. Install the brand new NWChem 6.1 with a better convergence algorithm by specifying the cgmin keyword in the dft block. Now you can still use the cartesian basis if you want.

Bert



[QUOTE=P99 Feb 15th 9:32 am][QUOTE=Bert Feb 13th 6:32 pm]The following input deck will converge without any problems, using an SCF as a starting guess for the DFT, and setting "tolerances tight" to avoid more loose integral and matrix element calculations during the early iterations of DFT.


Really this code converges in DFT, and ... then crashes. It would be nice to have the solution of the task, but not the convergence of the DFT per se. The convergence of the DFT requires a spherical basis, the calculation of charges requires a cartesian. As a result, we have not solution.

Clicked A Few Times
Threads 3
Posts 11
Thank you very much.


Forum >> NWChem's corner >> General Topics



Who's here now Members 0 Guests 0 Bots/Crawler 1


AWC's: 2.5.10 MediaWiki - Stand Alone Forum Extension
Forum theme style by: AWC