|
SEARCH
TOOLBOX
LANGUAGES
Forum Menu
Compiling NWChem on Cygwin
From NWChem
Viewed 9281 times, With a total of 17 Posts
|
Gets Around
Threads 26
Posts 85
|
|
2:49:39 AM PDT - Mon, May 20th 2013 |
|
Hi,
Thanks for the new version.
Unfortunately I was not able to compile it on Cygwin.
checking minix/config.h usability... no
checking minix/config.h presence... no
checking for minix/config.h... no
checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes
configure: searching for MPI_TS...
checking mpi.h usability... no
checking mpi.h presence... no
checking for mpi.h... no
configure: error: test for COMEX_NETWORK=MPI_TS failed
configure: error: ../../ga-5-2/comex/configure failed for comex
GNUmakefile:540: recipe for target `build/config.status' failed
Is it possible to compile it without MPI?
|
|
|
-
Edoapra Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, bureaucrat, sysop
|
|
Forum Vet
Threads 3
Posts 855
|
|
9:32:25 AM PDT - Mon, May 20th 2013 |
|
Need to have MPI installed
|
P99
A prerequisite for a NWChem 6.3 build is to have MPI installed.
An easy way to install MPI on Windows (that should be compatible with Cygwin)
is to grab the Mpich installer at
http://www.mpich.org/static/tarballs/1.4.1p1/mpich2-1.4.1p1-win-ia32.msi
Once you have installed mpich2,
please set MPI_INCLUDE, MPI_LIB and LIBMPI according to you installation setup.
|
|
|
|
Gets Around
Threads 26
Posts 85
|
|
6:35:37 AM PDT - Tue, May 21st 2013 |
|
Thank you for the reply.
Another couple of questions.
Does this mean that I will not be able to use NWChem without MPI on the one core?
In particular, should be MPI installed on each machine that uses NWChem binary?
I installed mpich2. However, it seems to me that Cygwin can see only its own folders, and I do not understand how to setup MPI paths.
|
|
|
-
Edoapra Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, bureaucrat, sysop
|
|
Forum Vet
Threads 3
Posts 855
|
|
2:30:45 PM PDT - Tue, May 21st 2013 |
|
Quote:P99 May 21st 5:35 amThank you for the reply.
Another couple of questions.
Does this mean that I will not be able to use NWChem without MPI on the one core?
In particular, should be MPI installed on each machine that uses NWChem binary?
I installed mpich2. However, it seems to me that Cygwin can see only its own folders, and I do not understand how to setup MPI paths.
In aswering your question
1) The non MPi code might still be there, but it is not maintained at all. You might try to use it at your own risk.
2) cygwin can see any Windows/DOS disk, e.g.
c:\ becomes /cygdrive/c/
d:\ becomes /cygdrive/d
There is even a utility for doing this kind conversions between windos and cygwin universes
http://cygwin-lite.sourceforge.net/html/cygpath.html
|
|
|
|
Gets Around
Threads 26
Posts 85
|
|
1:58:51 AM PDT - Wed, May 22nd 2013 |
|
Unfortunately, I never got compiled.
However, my main concern is - can I provide a binary file to my users? I understand that MPI is now required for use, but does that mean that the program can not be run in single-processor mode at all? Does this mean that every user will have to install MPI, or we can do a couple of dll? Will I be able to capture the output with an external program, as well as I do it on 6.1.1?
|
|
|
-
Bert Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, NWChemDeveloper, bureaucrat, sysop
|
|
Forum Vet
Threads 5
Posts 598
|
|
8:47:21 AM PDT - Thu, May 23rd 2013 |
|
ARMCI_NETWORK=SOCKETS
|
You can try compiling without MPI using "export ARMCI_NETWORK=SOCKETS". This should also produce a serial binary.
Bert
|
|
|
|
Clicked A Few Times
Threads 5
Posts 21
|
|
12:58:44 AM PDT - Fri, May 24th 2013 |
|
I'm trying to compile 6.3 under cygwin as well, using the same configuration that worked with 6.1.1 (using mpich2), now gives the following errors:
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.3/../../../../include/w32api/objbase.h:157:0,
from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.3/../../../../include/w32api/ole2.h:16,
from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.3/../../../../include/w32api/wtypes.h:12,
from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.3/../../../../include/w32api/winscard.h:10,
from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.3/../../../../include/w32api/windows.h:97,
from ../ga-5-2/global/src/globalp.h:27,
from ../ga-5-2/global/src/sparse.c:16:
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.3/../../../../include/w32api/wtypes.h:651:7: error: expected identifier or '(' before numeric constant
Makefile:7484: recipe for target `global/src/sparse.lo' failed
make[4]: *** [global/src/sparse.lo] Error 1
Makefile:7776: recipe for target `all-recursive' failed
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Makefile:4939: recipe for target `all' failed
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
GNUmakefile:525: recipe for target `build/.libs/libga.a' failed
make[1]: *** [build/.libs/libga.a] Error 1
GNUmakefile:111: recipe for target `libraries' failed
make: *** [libraries] Error 1
Any clue what goes wrong here?
|
|
|
|
Gets Around
Threads 26
Posts 85
|
|
3:26:31 AM PDT - Fri, May 24th 2013 |
|
I have the same problem with "ARMCI_NETWORK SOCKETS".
|
|
|
-
Bert Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, NWChemDeveloper, bureaucrat, sysop
|
|
Forum Vet
Threads 5
Posts 598
|
|
9:05:17 AM PDT - Fri, May 24th 2013 |
|
We are investigating the wtypes.h error.
|
|
|
-
Bert Forum:Admin, Forum:Mod, NWChemDeveloper, bureaucrat, sysop
|
|
Forum Vet
Threads 5
Posts 598
|
|
11:41:59 AM PDT - Fri, May 24th 2013 |
|
Fix for type errors using SOCKETS
|
In:
src/tools/ga-5-2/global/src/sparse.c
Swap lines 15 and 16, i.e. replace:
#include "abstract_ops.h"
#include "globalp.h"
With:
#include "globalp.h"
#include "abstract_ops.h"
There seems to be some order dependency with respect to definitions.
Bert
|
|
|
|
Clicked A Few Times
Threads 5
Posts 21
|
|
1:11:03 AM PDT - Mon, May 27th 2013 |
|
Yes, now it compiles properly. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Gets Around
Threads 26
Posts 85
|
|
5:24:17 AM PDT - Mon, May 27th 2013 |
|
Thank you very much, now compiled.
I have done the following:
Swap "abstract_ops.h" and "globalp.h" in src/tools/ga-5-2/global/src/sparse.c
csh
setenv NWCHEM_TOP ~/nwchem-6.3-src.2013-05-17
setenv NWCHEM_TARGET CYGWIN
setenv NWCHEM_MODULES all
setenv ARMCI_NETWORK SOCKETS
cd $NWCHEM_TOP/src
make nwchem_config
make > & make.log
Quote:Bert May 24th 11:41 amIn:
src/tools/ga-5-2/global/src/sparse.c
Swap lines 15 and 16, i.e. replace:
#include "abstract_ops.h"
#include "globalp.h"
With:
#include "globalp.h"
#include "abstract_ops.h"
There seems to be some order dependency with respect to definitions.
Bert
|
|
|
|
Gets Around
Threads 26
Posts 85
|
|
5:28:38 AM PDT - Mon, May 27th 2013 |
|
Hi Ivo,
Could you be so kind to explain how to compile with MPI.
Unfortunately, I have only a single processor version.
|
|
|
|
Clicked A Few Times
Threads 5
Posts 21
|
|
5:51:34 AM PDT - Mon, May 27th 2013 |
|
I have mpich2 installed under /home/ivo/mpich2-install.
Then I have the following environmental variables in place:
setenv NWCHEM_TOP /home/ivo/nwchem-6.3-src.2013-05-17
setenv NWCHEM_TARGET CYGWIN
setenv NWCHEM_MODULES all
setenv FC gfortran
setenv USE_MPI y
setenv LIBMPI "-lpmpich -lmpich -lopa -lmpl -lpthread -lmpichf90"
setenv MPI_LIB /home/ivo/mpich2-install/lib
setenv MPI_INCLUDE /home/ivo/mpich2-install/include
Then from /home/ivo/nwchem-6.3-src.2013-05-17/src I do:
make nwchem_config
make >& make.log
That at least works for me.
There are still some issues with some of the QA tests though. Will post them when they are done.
|
|
|
|
Clicked A Few Times
Threads 5
Posts 21
|
|
1:57:39 AM PDT - Thu, Jun 20th 2013 |
|
These are the results of the small tests:
Running tests/h2o_opt/h2o_opt
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/c2h4/c2h4
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/auh2o/auh2o
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/autosym/autosym
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/dft_he2+/dft_he2+
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/h2mp2/h2mp2
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/h2o/h2o
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/hess_h2o/hess_h2o
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/prop_h2o/prop_h2o
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/pyqa/pyqa
NWChem execution failed #Not using python, so this makes sense
Failed
Running tests/geom_zmatrix/geom_zmatrix
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/rimp2_ne/rimp2_ne
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/rimp2_he/rimp2_he
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/scf_feco5/scf_feco5
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/small_intchk/small_intchk
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/tagcheck/tagcheck
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/testtab/testtab
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o_dk/h2o_dk
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/u_sodft/u_sodft
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/cosmo_h2o/cosmo_h2o
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/ch5n_nbo/ch5n_nbo
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/h2s_finite/h2s_finite
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/startag/startag
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/cosmo_h2o_dft/cosmo_h2o_dft
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/cosmo_h2o_bq/cosmo_h2o_bq
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/be/be
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/dft_s12gh/dft_s12gh
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 difference for a gradient
Failed
Running tests/cosmo_trichloroethene/cosmo_trichloroethene
verifying output ... failed #0.0005 a.u. difference in effective nuclear erpulsion energy and dft energy
Running tests/esp/esp
verifying output ... ESP charges match
Running tests/esp_uhf/esp_uhf
verifying output ... ESP charges match
Running tests/dft_bsse/dft_bsse
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/bsse_dft_trimer/bsse_dft_trimer
verifying output ... failed #0.00014 kcal/mol difference in zero-point energy
Failed
Running tests/cosmo_h2cco2/cosmo_h2cco2
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/cosmo_h2cco2mg/cosmo_h2cco2mg
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/cosmo_h2cco2mg_ecp/cosmo_h2cco2mg_ecp
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/cosmo_h3co/cosmo_h3co
verifying output ... failed #0.0005 a.u. difference in effective nuclear repulsion energy, some numbers swapped
Running tests/cosmo_h3co_ecp/cosmo_h3co_ecp
NWChem execution failed #"too many iterations" "hnd_cosequ: too many iters 911"
Running tests/cosmo_h2cco2na/cosmo_h2cco2na
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 a.u. difference in effective nuclear repulsion energy
Running tests/cosmo_h3co_gp/cosmo_h3co_gp
verifying output ... failed #differences in effective nuclear repulsion energy (0.1 a.u.), coordinates (0.001) and gradients (0.002)
Failed
Running tests/dplot/dplot
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/dft_meta/dft_meta
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/dft_mpwb1khf/dft_mpwb1khf
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/dft_m05nh2ch3/dft_m05nh2ch3
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/prop_uhf_h2o/prop_uhf_h2o
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/et_zn_dimer/et_zn_dimer
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/vectors_rotate/vectors_rotate
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/sad_ch3hf/sad_ch3hf
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o_diag_to_cg/h2o_diag_to_cg
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/h2o_cg_to_diag/h2o_cg_to_diag
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o_diag_opt/h2o_diag_opt
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/h2o_cg_opt/h2o_cg_opt
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/h2o_diag_opt_ub3lyp/h2o_diag_opt_ub3lyp
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 difference in coordinate
Running tests/h2o_cg_opt_ub3lyp/h2o_cg_opt_ub3lyp
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/h2o_cg_opt_rob3lyp/h2o_cg_opt_rob3lyp
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 difference in coordiante, 0.0002 a.u. difference in effective nuclear repulsion energy
Failed
Running tests/h2o_diag_to_cg_ub3lyp/h2o_diag_to_cg_ub3lyp
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 difference in total dft energy
Running tests/h2o_cg_to_diag_ub3lyp/h2o_cg_to_diag_ub3lyp
verifying output ... OK
Failed
The oh2 test is testing the perl parsing script and SHOULD fail
Running tests/oh2/oh2
verifying output ... failed
Failed
Most of the differences seem to be very minor. The only job to give relatively big differences is cosmo_h3co_gp. And I don't know why cosmo_h3co_ecp crashed.
|
|
|
|
Clicked A Few Times
Threads 5
Posts 21
|
|
7:12:05 AM PDT - Thu, Jun 20th 2013 |
|
Medium tests:
Running tests/dft_feco5/dft_feco5
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/dft_siosi3/dft_siosi3
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/dft_cr2/dft_cr2
verifying output ... failed #0.0003 a.u. difference in effective nuclear repulsion energy
Failed
Running tests/dft_x/dft_x
verifying output ... failed #0.0003 a.u. difference in nuclear repulsion energy, 0.0001 difference in coordinates
Failed
Running tests/dft_mpw1k/dft_mpw1k
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 difference in coordinates
Running tests/dft_li2freq/dft_li2freq
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/h2o-hse/h2o-hse
verifying output ... OK
Failed
The intermediate values for this test may cause some differences.
Please check the final values for the last optimized structure.
Running tests/dielsalder/dielsalder
verifying output ... OK
OK
The intermediate energy values for the numerical gradient
test may cause some differences.
Please check the final gradient values for correctness.
Running tests/grad_ozone/grad_ozone
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/dft_ozone/dft_ozone
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 difference in gradient
Failed
Running tests/hess_c6h6/hess_c6h6
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/hess_nh3_ub3lyp/hess_nh3_ub3lyp
verifying output ... failed #0.00006 kcal/mol difference in zero-point energy, slightly different numbers for non-projected frequencies
Failed
Running tests/intchk/intchk
verifying output ... OK
OK
The intermediate values for this test may cause some differences.
Please check the final values for the last optimized structure.
Running tests/sadsmall/sadsmall
verifying output ... failed #coordinates mirrored, results identical
Failed
Running tests/sadbig/sadbig
verifying output ... failed #0.0003 a.u. difference in nuclear repulsion energy, small difference in coordinates (fourth digit)
Failed
Running tests/br2_dk/br2_dk
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/uo2_sodft/uo2_sodft
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/uo2_sodft_grad/uo2_sodft_grad
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/si2cl6_gc/si2cl6_gc
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/pspw/pspw
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/pspw_SiC/pspw_SiC
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/pspw_md/pspw_md
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/paw/paw
verifying output ... failed #0.005 difference in total paw energy
Failed
Running tests/pspw_polarizability/pspw_polarizability
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/pspw_stress/pspw_stress
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/band/band
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/tddft_h2o/tddft_h2o
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 difference in excitation energy
Failed
Running tests/tddft_h2o_uhf/tddft_h2o_uhf
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 difference in excitation energy
Failed
Running tests/tddft_h2o_mxvc20/tddft_h2o_mxvc20
NWChem execution failed #"tddft_diagon: negative excitation energy 0"
Failed
Running tests/tddft_h2o_uhf_mxvc20/tddft_h2o_uhf_mxvc20
NWChem execution failed #"tddft_diagon: negative excitation energy 0"
Failed
Running tests/tddft_n2+/tddft_n2+
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/tddft_ac_co/tddft_ac_co
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/tce_h2o/tce_h2o
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/tce_h2o_dipole/tce_h2o_dipole
NWChem execution failed #"BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES"
Failed
Running tests/tce_h2o_eomcc/tce_h2o_eomcc
NWChem execution failed #"BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES"
Failed
Running tests/tce_uhf_uccsd/tce_uhf_uccsd
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/tce_cr_eom_t_ch_rohf/tce_cr_eom_t_ch_rohf
verifying output ... failed #same numbers, different order
Failed
Running tests/tce_cr_eom_t_ozone/tce_cr_eom_t_ozone
NWChem execution failed #"createfile: failed ga_create size= 53514432"
Failed
Running tests/tce_active_ccsdt/tce_active_ccsdt
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/tce_lr_ccsd_t/tce_lr_ccsd_t
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/tce_lr_ccsd_tq/tce_lr_ccsd_tq
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/tce_ozone_2eorb/tce_ozone_2eorb
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/tce_polar_ccsd_small/tce_polar_ccsd_small
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/tce_eomsd_eomsol1/tce_eomsd_eomsol1
NWChem execution failed #"createfile: failed ga_create size= 3122005"
Failed
Running tests/tce_eomsd_eomsol2/tce_eomsd_eomsol2
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/tce_uracil_creomact/tce_uracil_creomact
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/oniom1/oniom1
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/c60_ecp/c60_ecp
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o_vscf/h2o_vscf
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/hi_zora_sf/hi_zora_sf
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/xe_zora_sf/xe_zora_sf
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/o2_zora_so/o2_zora_so
verifying output ... failed #0.0002 difference in nuclear repulsion energy, 0.0001 in gradients, up to 7 in non-projected frequencies
Failed
Running tests/hi_zora_so/hi_zora_so
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/asa_qmmm
failed: cannot access tests/asa_qmmm.nw #file not there
Failed
Running tests/qmmm_grad0/qmmm_grad0
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/lys_qmmm/lys_qmmm
verifying output ... failed #0.01 difference in effective nuclear repulsion energy, 0.0001 in dft energy, some in coordinates as well
Failed
Running tests/ethane_qmmm/ethane_qmmm
verifying output ... failed #slight differences in coordinates and gradients (0.0001)
Failed
Running tests/qmmm_opt0/qmmm_opt0
verifying output ... failed #0.003 difference in dft energy, 0.06 in nuclear repulsion energy and differences in coordinates
Failed
qmmm frequency test may fail
Running tests/qmmm_freq/qmmm_freq
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 kcal/mol diference in zero point energy
Failed
Running tests/prop_ch3f/prop_ch3f
verifying output ... failed #swapped signs, results identical
Failed
Running tests/prop_uhf_ch3f/prop_uhf_ch3f
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch3f_rot/ch3f_rot
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch3f_unrot/ch3f_unrot
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch3f_trans/ch3f_trans
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch3f_trans_cosmo/ch3f_trans_cosmo
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch3f_trans_cam_nmr/ch3f_trans_cam_nmr
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch3f_notrans_cosmo/ch3f_notrans_cosmo
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch3f-lc-wpbe/ch3f-lc-wpbe
verifying output ... failed #up to 0.004 difference in anisotropy
Failed
Running tests/ch3f-lc-wpbeh/ch3f-lc-wpbeh
verifying output ... failed #up to 0.004 difference in anisotropy
Failed
Running tests/ch3f_zora_shielding/ch3f_zora_shielding
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch2_props4_bp/ch2_props4_bp
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch3radical_rot/ch3radical_rot
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch3radical_unrot/ch3radical_unrot
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/cho_bp_props/cho_bp_props
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/prop_cg_nh3_b3lyp/prop_cg_nh3_b3lyp
NWChem execution failed #"task hessian incompatible with cgmin 0"
Failed
Running tests/acr-camb3lyp-cdfit/acr-camb3lyp-cdfit
verifying output ... failed #0.00007 difference in excitation energy
Failed
Running tests/acr-camb3lyp-direct/acr-camb3lyp-direct
verifying output ... failed #0.00006 difference in excitation energy
Failed
Running tests/acr_lcblyp/acr_lcblyp
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2_bnl/h2_bnl
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o_bnl/h2o_bnl
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o-camb3lyp-pol-cdfit/h2o-camb3lyp-pol-cdfit
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o-camb3lyp-pol/h2o-camb3lyp-pol
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o-cambeckehh/h2o-cambeckehh
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o-campbe0/h2o-campbe0
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o-lcpbe/h2o-lcpbe
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/o2_bnl/o2_bnl
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 difference in effective nuclear repulsion energy, also one cyle more used
Failed
Running tests/o2_hfattn/o2_hfattn
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o-hse/h2o-hse
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/m11_ch3/m11_ch3
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/m11_h2o/m11_h2o
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/m11-l_ch3/m11-l_ch3
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/m11-l_h2o/m11-l_h2o
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/m08hx_ch3/m08hx_ch3
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/m08hx_h2o/m08hx_h2o
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/m08so_ch3/m08so_ch3
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/m08so_h2o/m08so_h2o
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch3_m06-hf/ch3_m06-hf
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/cnh5_m06-2x/cnh5_m06-2x
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/cu2_m06-l/cu2_m06-l
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/dft_ch3ochch32/dft_ch3ochch32
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/fh_m06/fh_m06
failed: cannot access tests/fh_m06/fh_m06.nw #file not there
Failed
Running tests/dft_m05nh2ch3/dft_m05nh2ch3
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/disp_dimer_ch4/disp_dimer_ch4
verifying output ... failed #0.0002 difference in effective nuclear repulsion energy
Failed
Running tests/disp_dimer_ch4_cgmin/disp_dimer_ch4_cgmin
verifying output ... failed #0.0002 difference in dft energy, 0.05 in nuclear repulsion energy, gradients and coordinates differ as well
Failed
Running tests/h2o-b3lyp-disp/h2o-b3lyp-disp
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/Ne_scf-mp2_cc-vqz/Ne_scf-mp2_cc-vqz
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/Ne_b2plyp_cc-vqz/Ne_b2plyp_cc-vqz
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/He_scf-mp2_cc-vqz/He_scf-mp2_cc-vqz
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/He_b2plyp_cc-vqz/He_b2plyp_cc-vqz
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/Ar_scf-mp2_cc-vqz/Ar_scf-mp2_cc-vqz
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/Ar_b2plyp_cc-vqz/Ar_b2plyp_cc-vqz
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/dmo_tddft_cd/dmo_tddft_cd
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/dmo_tddft_cd_velocity/dmo_tddft_cd_velocity
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ptatom/ptatom
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o-ssb-d/h2o-ssb-d
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o-ssb-d-opt/h2o-ssb-d-opt
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o-noscf/h2o-noscf
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o-response/h2o-response
verifying output ... failed #"dft_CPHF2_read: failed to open./h2o-response.aoresp_fiao_f0"
Failed
Running tests/mep-test/mep-test
verifying output ... failed #0.00001 difference in dft energy, 0.002 in nuclear repulsion energy, some in coordinates
Failed
Running tests/ch2_props4_bp/ch2_props4_bp
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/pkzb/pkzb
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/k6h2o/k6h2o
NWChem execution failed #"0: pre_mkfrg failed 9999"
Failed
Running tests/mcscf_ch2/mcscf_ch2
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/mcscf_ozone/mcscf_ozone
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/sif_sodft/sif_sodft
verifying output ... failed #0.00006 difference in dft energy
Failed
Running tests/h2o_raman_3/h2o_raman_3
verifying output ... failed #0.0005 difference in nuclear repulsion energy, slight difference in coordinates and gradients, extra output
Failed
Running tests/h2o_raman_4/h2o_raman_4
verifying output ... failed #0.0007 difference in nuclear repulsion energy, slight differences in coordiantes and gradients, extra output
Failed
Running tests/tropt-ch3nh2/tropt-ch3nh2
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 difference in coordinates, slight differences in frequencies, 0.0001 kcal.mol in zero-point energy
Failed
Running tests/h3tr1/h3tr1
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/h3_dirdyvtst/h3_dirdyvtst
verifying output ... failed #almost the same
Failed
Running tests/geom_load_xyz/geom_load_xyz
verifying output ... failed #0.0001 difference in gradients
Failed
Running tests/dft_sicperth2o/dft_sicperth2o
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o_hcons/h2o_hcons
verifying output ... failed #differences in intermediate energy values and slight differences in final coordinates
Failed
Running tests/etf_hcons/etf_hcons
verifying output ... failed #0.001 difference in nuclear repulsion energy
Failed
Running tests/h2o2-prop-notrans/h2o2-prop-notrans
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/cnh5_m06-2x/cnh5_m06-2x
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/bq_nio/bq_nio
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/hess_ch4/hess_ch4
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o_frozemb/h2o_frozemb
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/cho_bp_props/cho_bp_props
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/cho_bp_zora_finite/cho_bp_zora_finite
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o-ssb-d-b3lyp/h2o-ssb-d-b3lyp
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/cu2_m06-l/cu2_m06-l
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch3_m06-hf/ch3_m06-hf
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/dntmc_h2o_nh3/dntmc_h2o_nh3
NWChem execution failed #"0:ga_pgroup_destroy_:Attempt to destroy process group with attached GAs:Received an Error in Communication"
Failed
Running tests/5h2o_core/5h2o_core
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/h2o_core/h2o_core
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/co_core/co_core
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/talc/talc
verifying output ... failed #final value identical
Failed
Running tests/carbon_fon/carbon_fon
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/ch5n_nbo/ch5n_nbo
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/tpss/tpss
verifying output ... OK
Running tests/tpssh/tpssh
verifying output ... OK
OK
Running tests/neb-fch3cl/neb-fch3cl
verifying output ... failed #0.00003 difference in scf energy, slightly different coordinates
Running tests/neb-isobutene/neb-isobutene
verifying output ... failed #differences in intermediate structures?
Failed
Running tests/nwxc_pspw_1he/nwxc_pspw_1he
verifying output ... failed #0.005 difference in pspw energy
Running tests/nwxc_pspw_3he/nwxc_pspw_3he
#hangs
Hangs at nwxc_pspw_3he, so last tests not done. Will try at later stage.
Although there are quite some differences, I guess most of them are not a problem.
Comments welcome.
|
|
|
AWC's:
2.5.10 MediaWiki - Stand Alone Forum Extension Forum theme style by: AWC
| |